Global governance on EU agenda

When Communists, Hard line Socialists and Maoists all failed to gain popular support, when their repressive soviet style regimes crumbled from within one by one, they took heed. With their full frontal politics cast aside they changed their modus operandi.

They now appear as the nice guys, the people who have your interests at heart, they come as leaders in ‘civil society’, union leaders, chief constables, health experts, ‘community leaders’, ‘progressives’ and as ‘reformed’ politicians, but they all follow the same new authoritarian politics – communitarianism.

It falls under different names depending on where you look – liberalism, modern socialism, red toryism, social democracy, but its the same malignant, evil socialism at work behind the scenes.

We have seen the rise in recent years of government interference beyond all norms, we have seen the creation of a dependent nation, politicised charities and secretive ‘leadership training’, we have seen the socialising of private company debt and the privatisation of profit (there is socialist method in that madness until the profiteers are no longer required)

It reminds me of a scene in Goodfellas, when Robert de Nero is explaining what happens when its your turn, when they come for you. “So your murderers come with smiles. They come as your friends, the people who have cared for you all of your life, and they always seem to come at a time when you’re at your weakest and most in need of their help.”

Westminster politicians know all about that, from both ends. There have been a few sacrificial lambs.

and then there is the rise of international bodies that are provided with powers way beyond our shores. The IMF, World Bank, WHO, International Court etc etc, they appear in every possible industry, every possible area of expertise. Here is an example;

In international transportation of dangerous goods or hazardous materials, there are three international organizations involved in the regulation of the transportation of the materials in international trade: 1) the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 2) the International Maritime Organization (IMO), and 3) the European Highway (ADR) and Rail (RID) Transport Committee. In addition, the United Nations “Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods,” working under the auspices of the U.N. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) located in New York with operational support provided by the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) located in Geneva, Switzerland, has prepared recommendations for the transport of these materials. (source)

There are now literally thousands of these international bodies. So many unelected people working for unaccountable organisations making decisions that either affect you directly or certainly affect the economics of everything you buy or use.

We can see these ‘reformed’ politicians and progressives at work every day, they now populate every facet of our lives, and in the majority of cases they are unelected, but even the elected ones are working to the agenda.

World Government is and always has been the ultimate goal of these people. By its very nature it will be repressive if it is to survive, because the people, the populations, around the globe will never willingly accept it.

A myth? A conspiracy? No

The European Parliament (EP) has passed a resolution that calls for the creation of a new body at the UN  —  a Parliamentary Assembly that would gradually transition from a citizens’ watchdog to a world parliament with co-decision powers, directly elected by the citizens of the world. Hmm, like the EU perhaps…

If ever there was an example of this kind of communitarian authoritarianism at work it has to be the EU. Whilst it has an elected body, it has no power. The power lies with the unelected, and unaccountable EU Commission.

The European Parliament’s June 2011 recommendation to the Council of the European Union which is responsible for the bloc’s foreign and security policy, advocates establishing a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) within the UN system in order to increase the democratic accountability and transparency of global governance, acknowledging that a UNPA would be complementary to existing bodies. The proposal was jointly supported by conservative and liberal Members of the EP.

So just like the EU, this new proposed body would have no power, that would still lie with the UN and all those International Regulatory Bodies over which the populations of the world will have no say.

At every level, from the local to the national, and beyond to the international, the communitarian’s are planning and shaping your life. It will not be a good future.

Remember De Niro’s words, especially if you are one of those people who is getting rich on the back of this communitarian agenda. When you have helped to establish the new regimes and your work is done….


About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in European Union, Main Page and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.