Is Van Rompuy attempting a 2nd coup d’etat

A second one, didn’t know he had achieved a first one I hear you say.

This from the Telegraph 20th Nov 2009:

Last year, six months before becoming prime minister, he abused his position as speaker of the Belgian parliament to cancel a politically inconvenient debate. To make doubly sure that MPs would be silenced, he had the locks on the plenary chamber’s doors changed so deputies could not get into their own parliament. The tactic was described by opposition MPs as a “coup d’etat”.

The Telegraph warned then that Van Rompuy is a sharp political operator who is not above using dirty tricks to stymie his opponents. That Europe’s leaders may find to their cost that the man they chose to chair their EU summits possesses dark arts that will be turned against anyone.

Now, Van Rompuy, in a press announcement following the meeting of the Task Force on Economic Governance 27th Sept 2010 said:

Whenever possible, decision-making rules on sanctions should be more automatic and based on a reverse majority rule, implying a Commission proposal is adopted unless rejected by the Council.

Erm, what? Assume the Commission has the power unless the Council votes no.

As Dan Hannan in the Telegraph today muses. So here is an innovation which would substantially shift power from the national capitals to the Commission, and which concerns an issue of major importance (levying fines), but which seems to have no legal basis.

Is the EU – yet again – making up the rules as it goes along?

In his quest for a Federal EU State (not forgetting that he has already tried in the UN) is Van Rompuy going for a 2nd ‘coup d’etat’? or is it his 3rd?

The old housewives saying of Beware of the Quiet Ones is spot on here. He is without doubt a very dangerous man. We should be more concerned about what Van Rompuy is up to rather than listening to the media swooning over our Provincial Governors parading in Birmingham this week.

h/t EnglandExpects

Whenever possible, decision-making rules on sanctions should be more automatic and based on a reverse majority rule, implying a Commission proposal is adopted unless rejected by the Council.

About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in European Union and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Is Van Rompuy attempting a 2nd coup d’etat

  1. Pingback: Is Van Rompuy attempting a 2nd coup d’etat | The Albion Alliance presents

  2. Sue says:

    Why on earth are MEP’s putting up with this?

  3. Fascist Hippy says:

    Well I’m saying no, what shall I do walk over to Brussels on my own and tell him? I think we need cohesion in the matter and then a plan and a direction; we are certainly not getting assistance from our elected representatives, so what next?

  4. Nick says:

    Rompuy is a Washington Neo-Con stooge.

Comments are closed.