The State of the Union (european version)

Today, its time to take a good cold hard look at the EU, and how the new post Lisbon EU state has started to impose its will and its influence on us here in the UK.

My colleague James Higham has produced a well researched, well linked, 3 part factual presentation on the state of the union as it relates to the UK today, a very long and very detailed explanation that outlines the potential dangers that face the continued existence of the UK, with examples and the legal challenges that present themselves.

Britain is changing, our politicians try desperately to hide this change invoked by the EU under various guises, as their own party policy, as global pressures, as incompetence by their opponents, but reading through all of James’ work, you can clearly see that very little of it is home grown, its a majority change imported from Brussels.

It has always been the method of the European ‘project’ to hide as much detailed information as possible from the public, only presenting small amounts of legislation and rules, usually served in a manner that only explains economic benefit without detailing the loss of rights, freedoms and sovereignty, and this is an attempt to rectify some of that imbalance.

I urge you to read James’ works carefully, because it could have profound implications on the way you see politicians, parties and may even affect the way you end up voting at the next election.

I hope that you find it thought provoking, will make you ask more questions, and become less inclined to believe without questioning everything that you read in the newspapers or watch on the BBC news.

Anyway, here are the links to the 3 part article.



Take your time, re-read it if you need to, follow as many of the provided links as necessary to keep it all in context, but please take the time to do so. This trilogy by James does not draw any conclusions, it leaves that to you, and provides for discussion in a separate comments section.

I am also aware that many of my readers are pro-EU supporters, with some still arguing that we still retain the tools to manage our own destiny. I think you will find that the facts as presented by James may give pause for thought, even make some of you question the way in which this new state operates, and to ask whether this is right or not for the public good.

I therefore invite everyone to read all 3 parts, and then join in the discussion.


About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in European Union and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The State of the Union (european version)

  1. jameshigham says:

    It’s so difficult to get over to people the urgency of the thing. It really needs a further article specifically on this question of urgency and facts why.

Comments are closed.