Norfolk loses its County Town

In the rush to enable the national 2 tier local authority system to bring us into line with the rest of the EU, as from April 2011 Norfolk will lose its ancient County Town.

Norwich will become a County!! and the area of the city is to be excluded from that of the county of Norfolk.

Here is the explanation of the Draft Statutory Instrument, The Norwich and Norfolk (Structural Changes) Order 2010 (Government by Executive, no parliamentary debate required) that creates Norwich as a County.

This Order provides for the establishment, on 1st April 2011, of a single tier of local government for the city of Norwich (article 3). A new county, to be known as Norwich, is created, with the same area as the city, but without county councillors. The area of the city is excluded from that of the county of Norfolk from 1st April 2011.

The city will be administered on and after 1st April 2011 by Norwich City Council.

In Part 3 of the Order, article 4(1) confers on Norwich City Council and Norfolk County Council the function of preparing for the transfer on 1st April 2011 of the County Council’s functions, property, rights and liabilities, so far as they relate to Norwich (the “main transitional function”). Article 4(3) makes provision for the discharge of the main transitional function by a committee of the City Council’s executive, to be known as its “Implementation Executive”. This arrangement is to begin when this Order comes into force and to end on the fourth day after the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2011 (“the transitional period”), when councillors newly-elected to the City Council come into office. The membership of the Implementation Executive is to be drawn from both the City Council and the County Council. Article 5 provides for the Implementation Executive to have responsibility, instead of the City and County Councils, during the transitional period, for the discharge of certain functions of those Councils if specified by the Secretary of State (“article 5 functions”).

Article 6(1) makes the discharge of the main transitional function and the article 5 functions a responsibility of the Implementation Executive during the transitional period. Article 6(2) and (3) modifies section 14(5) and (6) of the Local Government Act 2000 (“the 2000 Act”) so as to extend the range of arrangements available to the Executive for the discharge of those responsibilities. Article 6(4) disapplies, until the end of the transitional period, and in relation to the Implementation Executive, section 21 of the 2000 Act, which deals with the overview and scrutiny of decisions of local authorities. Instead, paragraphs (5) and (6) of article 6 require arrangements to be made by the City Council and the County Council under section 101(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 for the review or scrutiny by a joint committee of decisions or other action taken by the Implementation Executive, and for recommendations or reports to be made to that Executive. Article 6(7) provides for that committee to make a report to the City Council and the County Council.

Article 7 requires the Implementation Executive to prepare an Implementation Plan which must include budgets, plans and timetables relevant to the process of transition to single tier local government. In discharging the main transitional function and the article 5 functions, the Implementation Executive is required to have regard to the City Council’s response to the Secretary of State in support of its proposal for single tier local government in Norwich. Article 8 provides for the establishment of a team of officers drawn from the City Council and the County Council to assist the Implementation Executive.

Part 4 of the Order concerns the functions of the City Council and the County Council relevant to transition. Article 9 requires those Councils to prepare for the transition to single tier local government, to consult and co-operate, to disclose relevant information and, generally, to further the purposes of the Order.

In Part 5 of the Order, article 10 requires the holding of a whole council election to the City Council in 2011, 2015 and every fourth year after 2015. The 2011 and 2015 elections are to be conducted on the basis of the wards established by article 3 of the City of Norwich (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 (“the 2002 Order”). Each ward will continue to return three councillors. Article 11 cancels the elections to Norwich City Council that would have taken place in 2010 and extends the term of office of councillors elected before the 2011 election to the fourth day after the 2011 election day. It also provides that no by-elections should be held for any of the Norwich county electoral divisions in the 6 months leading up to the abolition of those divisions.

Articles 12 and 13 make consequential amendments to the 2002 Order and the County of Norfolk (Electoral Changes) Order 2005 and revoke the remaining two provisions of the City of Norwich (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1977.

A full impact assessment has been produced for this Order. A copy of the assessment has been deposited in the Library of both Houses of Parliament and may be accessed at

Of particular interest to the voters may be article 11, which cancels elections in Norwich and extends the term of office to the incumbents until the new County is established in 2011.

Were any voters in Norfolk asked?

Anyone in Norfolk got anything to say?

Anyone in Parliament got anything to say?

Any parliamentary candidates got anything to say?

This of course is the pre-cursor to Norwich becoming the Capital of the Eastern Region of the UK, one of the 12 Regions which presently make up the UK, as part of the 277 region EU, known as sub-national authorities, administered by the Committee of the Regions in Brussels.

Note: a similar order has been issued for Exeter, which will likewise become the capital of the South West Region.


1 Letter from DCLG to all Chief Execs in Norwich County:

2. Lords Call for Evidence:



About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.