Changes to illegal English parking fines

The British government is changing the rules on parking fines in England writes Wonko's World.

The Northern Irish Secretary of State for Transport, Ruth Kelly, and
her 3 Ministers for Transport (two of which are Scottish of course) are
introducing changes to the rules in England so that variable rates of
parking fines can be implemented and to remove the requirement for
traffic wardens to physically attach a ticket to a vehicle
meaning that
tickets can be written out and issued after the offence has occurred or
from CCTV images.

The problem with this is that it could take a couple of weeks for a
parking ticket to eventually arrive and can you remember where you were
at, say, 9.38 in the morning a week last Saturday?  I have trouble
remembering what I did yesterday, let alone a fortnight ago, so how do
you defend yourself?

And this still doesn’t address the core problem with the parking
fines system which is that summary justice is illegal in England.  The
Bill of Rights says that “and promise of fine or forfeiture before
conviction is illegal and void”.

Traffic wardens and “parking attendants” are not judges, the street
is not a court of law and neither is a CCTV control centre.  Parking
fines are only legal if the accused has been convicted in a court of
law.  We need the legal system to protect our constitutional rights,
not to make it easier for companies and local authorities to issue
illegal and unconstitutional on-the-spot fines.

When will the judiciary stand up and state that these 'common laws' are unconstitutional.

Advertisements

About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Changes to illegal English parking fines

  1. Anonymous says:

    It's only a short step from this to the point where the police demand access to mobile phone call logs and issue speeding tickets to anyone whose handset was moving from cell to cell in excess of the speed limit.
    Of course, if you can prove that you were on a train, rather than driving, they'll let you off. Not because it's legal… just out of sympathy.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Police FPNs have never been illegal under the English Bill of Rights, because you've always had the option to go to court instead. The decision whether to go to court or pay the fine has always been the driver's. If you go to court and get convicted, then the fine is legal. The problem is that parking has now be de-criminalised, so you don't have the option to go to court, therefore the fine is illegal. When a local authority prosecutes, it is not for the 'offence' but for recovery of the fine.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Many thanks indeed for the professional clarification.
    I hope it will be of use to others.