The EU Reform Treaty aka Constitution

The European Commission has now published its final version
of a document titled:

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION, Reforming Europe
for the 21st Century.

‘Opinion of the European
Commission, pursuant to Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union, on the
Conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States convened
to revise the Treaties’

You can link to the 8 page document here
courtesy of Statewatch.

It is worth noting that even in the preface of the document, there is a bold  admission and
I quote. 

The disappearance of
some elements, including some symbolic ones, as well as changes that reduced
the readability of the Treaty text, were necessary parts of a package agreement
which could be subscribed to by all Member States. The Commission actively
contributed to this compromise.

Basically this means that the Commission lawyers worked a
lot of overtime to ensure that the bulk of the treaty would be totally
unreadable to the bulk of the member states parliamentarians and public, decipherable
only by lawyers, and therefore we could be told it means whatever political
agenda was in play and wanted it to mean. 

By an other name, trickery and treachery, and an admission
of guilt.

The document also goes on to state:

Future changes to
policies within existing competences, extensions to qualified majority voting
and use of co-decision can be agreed without needing to call a new
IGC, while preserving the need for unanimous
agreement.  

I read this clause to mean: we can change what we want once
your parliaments have lied, deceived and tricked you, and we will never have to
refer back to you again, unless we want to at which time unanimous agreement
will be required.

The speed and apparent rush to get this treaty ratified is
baffling. I cannot work out what the final agenda here is, but they are clearly
open about it and it is certainly highlighted in the document. 

Europe needs a Reform Treaty to be agreed and
ratified ahead of the June 2009 European elections. It is the responsibility of
all participants in the Inter-Governmental Conference to create the conditions
for this goal to be met.

Again, we see this treachery – create the conditions for
this goal to be met – and we already know that the EU has openly told Gordon Brown
to lie
to the British people
.

WHY ? Why the need to get this done before 2009. ?  Is it that they see there is a once only
chance to get this through before it all begins to unravel as the populations
of the member states begin to realise what’s at stake for them.

 

The general wording of the document almost makes it all
welcoming, all embracing and only good can come of it. 

I beg to differ, for I see this as the beginning of one of
the most totalitarian regimes that the world has ever encountered. We have been
subjected to diktats for the past 30 odd years, with those laws and
requirements having gathered pace dramatically over the last 5 years and in
2007 the arrogance from the European Commission has raised itself to unprecedented
levels as the Elite think they can smell victory.

I have no intention of giving them that victory, not without
a bloody nose at least, and I urge all sane people of Europe to oppose this
treaty before we all live in a world where to oppose anything will see
you branded a social outcast or even
worse
as the President of Italy, Giorgio Napolitano says, Eurosceptics are
“psychological terrorists” because they suggest that there is a
growing “European superstate.”

 

So to the President of Italy I say: not only do I suggest that's exactly what it is, an Empire, in my humble opinion….I believe that,

 

The
European Union must be destroyed

L'Union Européenne diot être détruite

Unio
Europaea delenda est

 

Advertisements

About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.