Towards a Totalitarian Europe

This is a reprint of an article published
today by the Brussels

It makes interesting reading, as the writer
is close to those right in the heart of the European Commission, and sees things that are just
not spoken about, and certainly not published by the
UK press. This view is one that the British people should be aware of.


Former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovksy has warned
that the European Union is on its way to becoming another
Soviet Union. When people who have worked on higher levels in
the EU system note similarities as well, it is time people start taking this
idea seriously.

In 2002 Louis Michel, the then Belgian
minister of foreign affairs and today a member of the European Commission, told the Belgian parliament
that the EU will eventually encompass North Africa and the Middle East as well
as Europe. The MEDA
, the principal financial instrument for the implementation of the
Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, between 2000-2006 spent €5,350 million on its
various programs, according to the EU’s official website. During the period
1995-1999, some 86% of the resources allocated to MEDA were channelled to
Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey and the Palestinian Authority.

From 2007, MEDA will be replaced by the European Neighbourhood
and Partnership Instrument
, which over the period 2007 to 2013 is projected
to spend €11 billion on, among other things, promoting cooperation between
European and Arab countries in the sectors of energy and transport; in higher
education and mobility of teachers, researchers and students; Multicultural
dialogue through people-to-people contacts, including links with communities of
immigrants living in EU countries as well as cooperation between civil
societies, cultural institutions and exchanges of young people. The European
Commission, the EU’s powerful government with extensive legislative powers,
shall coordinate cooperation with non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
universities, churches, religious associations and the media in matters related
to this project, all according to documents available on the Internet.

Bat Ye’or, author of the book Eurabia,
has warned against the post-Western culture of Palestinianism
that has been promoted through these networks for decades: “Through a
coordinated campaign monitored by the networks of the European Union bodies, a
system linking politics to markets, culture, universities, media and opinion
makers, has spread its totalitarian grip over the member-states in order to
impose a despicable culture of lies and denial that support Europe's
pro-Palestinian foreign policy.”

The EU Commission and senior officials,
frequently diffused through innocent sounding and semi-official organizations,
create agreements with Arabs and then quietly implement them later as federal
EU policy. This is accomplished because billions of Euros are floating around
in a system with very little control. Europeans are thus financing
their continent’s merger
with, in reality colonization by, the Muslim world
without their knowledge and without their consent. It must be the first time in
human history where an entire continent is being culturally eradicated with
bureaucratic precision. This represents perhaps the greatest betrayal in the
history of Western civilization, yet it is largely ignored by Western media.

Joschka Fischer, ex-German foreign minister,
warned that
Europe risks becoming a “playground” for upcoming superpowers in the 21st
century. He wanted more EU cooperation to remedy this. But we already are a
playground for foreign powers, for Muslim nations in particular, who can dump
their unsustainable population growth in our countries and harass the native
population with near-impunity, and this is actively caused by the EU. It is going
to be interesting for future historians to unveil how many senior EU leaders or
bureaucrats have been bought and paid by Saudi Arabian oil money.

The idea that the EU is going to become a
superpower is laughable.
Europe at the dawn of the 21st century is a global joke, a
decadent, weak and pathetic continent, despised by its enemies and viewed with
pity by its friends. Outsiders don’t expect
Europe to generate anything new, quite a few will be surprised if it even
survives. This image will not be improved by leaders who have not only
abandoned, but are attacking their own people, selling out their historical
legacy to their worst enemies, and muzzling those who object to this.

You cannot artificially create a dynamic
power through bureaucratic decisions, you do it through the rule of law – laws
passed with the consent of the people, with their best interest in mind and
therefore respected by them – respect for private property rights and by
getting the state out of the way as much as possible. There are no short-cuts.
It is ridiculous to believe that this ramshackle, top-heavy Frankenstein
monster is going to make
Europe more competitive.

I am not against cooperation between
European countries in whatever form, but definitely in the shape of a
pan-European dictatorship with massive amounts of bureaucracy. I understand the
argument that individual nation states, save perhaps
Germany, are too small to compete with China and the likes. Perhaps. But we need to get our
priorities straight: Survival comes first; creating a dynamic economy comes
second. The simple truth is that the EU constitutes a mortal threat to the
former, and does absolutely nothing to advance the latter.

Paul Belien, the editor of the Brussels
Journal, has argued in his book A
Throne in Brussels
Belgium is used as a blueprint for the wider European Union.
In 2000, Belgian authorities passed a so-called “Quick Citizenship” Act. In
1960, 7.3% of the population in the city of
Brussels was foreign. Today the figure has risen to 56.5%.
According to Jan Hertogen, a Marxist sociologist, this population replacement “is
an impressive and unique development from a European, or even a world

Yes, it is probably unprecedented in human
history that a country has handed over its main city to others without firing a
single shot, although this feat is now being repeated in many other European
cities. Is there no opposition to this in
Belgium? Yes there is, but they get silenced or even banned.
The Flemish nationalist Vlaams Blok was
for “racism,” and changed its name. The racism consisted of citing
government statistics on overrepresentation in crime by immigrants. The judge
concluded that “truth is no defense.”

Père Samuel, a Turkish-born
Catholic priest and one of the few speaking the language of Jesus, Aramaic, has
been prosecuted for “incitement to racist hatred” by the Belgian Centre for
Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism (CEOOR), because of a remark he
made in 2002 when he said: “Every thoroughly islamized Muslim child that is
born in Europe is a time bomb for Western children in the future. The latter
will be persecuted when they have become a minority.” He claims Muslims are
Europe and warns for an impending civil war.

Belgium is an artificial state dominated by
a French-speaking bureaucratic elite, and could be viewed as a laboratory for
what the EUrabians want to do to the rest of the continent, such as population
replacement, largely by Muslims, and silencing opposition to this by legal
harassment and through various mechanisms de facto disenfranchise the native

Article ten in the European
Convention on Human Rights supposedly ensures freedom of speech, yet spends
more text on defining what is not included within the limits of free speech
than on what is. Criminalizing ideas is dangerous. As John Stuart Mill
explained in his book On Liberty, freedom of speech is the foundation of true
liberty. Swedish writer John
argues that one of the virtues of free speech is that politically
incorrect viewpoints force others to rationally argue against them.

In 2007, the EU agreed to make incitement to
racism and xenophobia a crime
across the 27-nation bloc
. Under the
new law
, offenders will face up to three years in jail for “public incitement
to violence or hatred, directed against a group of persons or a member of such
a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or
ethnic origin.” The term “inciting hatred” against “religion” will no doubt be
used by Muslims to silence critics of Islam, especially since the Council of
Europe has earlier decided to view Islamophobia as equal to

The EU’s classified handbook, also released
in 2007, bars governments from speaking of “jihad” or linking Islam and
terrorism. But since we now have pan-European anti-racism laws and pan-European
guidelines banning mentioning any connection between Islam and violence, does
that mean that it will be impossible to talk about the Jihad Europeans are
subject to? The purpose of this legislation can be none other than to muzzle
critics of mass immigration

As Robert Spencer
, “Soon Eurabia will resemble the old
Soviet Union, in which dissidents furtively distributed samizdat
literature and faced stiff penalties if the authorities discovered what they
were doing. Europeans who care about what is happening to them will have to
travel West, buy books that tell the truth about Islamic jihad, and distribute
them at home away from the watchful eye of EU bureaucrats.”

The European Union is basically an attempt –
a rather successful one so far – by the elites in European nation states to
cooperate on usurping power, bypassing and eventually abolishing the democratic
system, a slow-motion coup d’état. It works because the national parliaments
are still there, and most people don’t see how much has changed. Seeing is
believing. If a small group of people decided to openly sideline the democratic
process and start imposing laws which the public didn’t approve, there would be
a rebellion. But this is what the EU has done. They have just been smart enough
to hide this fact under multiple layers of impenetrable bureaucratic Newspeak,
to make sure average citizens don’t fully appreciate the magnitude of what’s
going on. Ideas such as “promoting peace” are used as a pretext for this, a
bone thrown to fool the gullible masses and veil what is essentially a naked
power grab.

The EU can bribe the national elites by
appealing to their vanity and sense of importance, elevate them from a national
level to an “international level,” give them nice cars, fancy sounding jobs
with power unrestrained by silly prosaic things such as the will of the people.

Through promoting Multiculturalism and mass
immigration, the EUrocrats hope to create a new, larger political entity by
smashing the older nation states. And besides, it's easier to control people
who have no distinct cultural or national identity. These self-serving elites
are betraying the trust of the people they are supposed to serve, using them as
guinea pigs in a disastrous social experiment by dismantling their culture and
importing Muslims who attack them. They probably despise their own people, who
meekly accept this and believe their ridiculous excuses.

Native Europeans, who are no longer safe in
their own cities, have been robbed of their history and have accepted more
immigration in a shorter period of time than probably any other people in human
history, yet are met with intimidation and repression if they refuse to accept
more. This constitutes evil, there is no other way to put it.

to journalist John O’Sullivan
, “Some defenders of the EU claim that this
admittedly undemocratic provision is offset by the increased powers of the
European parliament. But this greatly exaggerates the representative nature of
the Euro-parliament. Though formally democratic by virtue of being elected, it
has no continent-wide European public opinion to which it might be
accountable.” He adds that “It was local nationalisms in
Britain and occupied Europe that provided most of the morale to resist fascist ideologies.”

This last point, that Nazi Germany was
defeated by proud nations states such as the
United States and Britain (a long time ago), is totally lost on the EU elites.
Commissioner Margot
Wallstrom argued
that those who resisted pooling national sovereignty
risked a return to Nazi horrors of the 1930s and 1940s. Her fellow
Commissioners issued a joint declaration, stating that EU citizens should pay
tribute to the dead of the Second World War by voting Yes to the EU

The Constitution will move even more power
into the hands of the already powerful and unaccountable elites. The EUrocrats
are basically saying that since somebody may conceivably threaten our
democratic system at some point in the future, we might as well dismantle it
now, in an orderly fashion. Moreover, whereas constitutions have traditionally
outlined the basic workings of the state, the proposed European Constitution,
running into hundreds of pages, betrays an almost sharia-like desire to
regulate all aspects of life. It is an instrument of control, a blueprint for
an authoritarian state.

Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state, but
such societies can also be transnational, as was the
Soviet Union, which the EU resembles more than just
superficially: An artificial superstate run by an authoritarian bureaucracy
that overrides the will of the people and imposes its ideology on the populace.
Are we back in the E.U.S.S.R?

Although the EU, due to its transnational
nature, most closely resembles the
Soviet Union, there
are also similarities with Nazi Germany. The EU was created by perfecting the
Big Lie technique that was championed by Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph
Goebbels: Serve people massive lies, so big that they cannot believe that
anybody would lie about it, and they will believe them, at least for a while.

It should also be mentioned that Adolf
Hitler stated his admiration for the warlike nature of Islam. The admiration
was mutual. Muhammad
Amin al-Husayni
, the Mufti of Jerusalem, was an Arab nationalist and
passionate anti-Semite who cooperated closely with Nazi Germany during World
War II. Later, leadership of Palestinian Arabs was transferred to Husayni’s
nephew Yasser Arafat, a very dear friend of the EU, who in 2002 gave an
interview in which he referred to “our hero al-Husayni.”

If the EU is supposed to protect us from the
horrors of Nazi Germany, it is remarkable how many of its traits it is copying,
such as flirting with Arab strongmen and admiration for Islam. The Muslim
immigration the EU is promoting to Europe has triggered the largest wave of
anti-Semitism since the rise of, well, Nazi Germany, and may yet force the
remaining Jews to leave. That Europeans should support this organization to
prevent a new totalitarian regime is a sick joke. The EU is a lot closer to
totalitarian states than the supposedly evil nation states it is going to

Since there is no European demos, no
pre-political loyalty or shared public community, and since legislate power has
been transferred to the unelected EU Commission, there is no way the EU can
function as a democracy in any meaningful sense of the term. The EU can only
become one giant
Yugoslavia, either ruled by an authoritarian oligarchy in the
fashion of Tito, or fall apart into civil wars.

The slow, but steady stifling of free speech
through legislation and Muslim Jihad violence indicates an ominous trend:
Europe is moving in a totalitarian direction. This cannot be stopped or
reversed before we stop Muslim immigration, which again cannot happen unless we
dismantle the European Union. Getting rid of the EU is the key to
Europe’s survival, which is now very much in question.


NuLab – Destroying Britain from the inside out.

About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.