Courageous Hilary Benn

The courageous Hilary
Benn has declared
that the term ‘War on Terror’ does not reflect the terror threats that we are
apparently fighting. 

He says that it
makes the various small disparate groups seem part of something bigger.

Mr Benn will say
in his speech: “In the
UK, we do not use the phrase 'War on Terror'
because we can't win by military means alone, and because this isn't us against
one organised enemy with a clear identity and a coherent set of objectives. 

“It is the
vast majority of the people in the world – of all nationalities and faiths –
against a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups.

“What these
groups want is to force their individual and narrow values on others without
dialogue, without debate, through violence. And by letting them feel part of
something bigger, we give them strength.”


I
call Hilary Benn courageous because the last British Minister to make this
claim was Robin Cook, who ended up
dead.

He said
that Al-queda only existed in a database in
Washington. Robin Cook said in an
article in The Guardian:
Al-Qaida, literally
“the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of
mujahideen
who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. 

He went on to
say: So long as the struggle against terrorism is conceived as a war that can
be won by military means, it is doomed to fail. The more the west emphasises
confrontation, the more it silences moderate voices in the Muslim world who
want to speak up for cooperation. Success will only come from isolating the
terrorists and denying them support, funds and recruits, which means focusing
more on our common ground with the Muslim world than on what divides us.

Within
a month of making that statement Robin Cook was dead.

As far as I know,
this was the first time publicly, in the anglophone world, that the al-Qaeda
name had been explained as referring to a computer database, and of course the Al-Qaeda name was falsely used as the reason for all the anti-terrorist laws that followed.


Questions
over Robin Cook’s death
have still not been answered, some have suggested that he was murdered, along
with David
Kelly
and John Smith in order to keep the truth from the public eye. Hugo Young's last column before he died was about David Kelly.

With
regard to John Smith, one commenter said:
John Smith attended Bilderberg as leader of the
opposition and opposed their plans for the world, he insisted on bringing a
trusted adviser (Robin Cook) along the next year to help him put his case to the plutocrats
but was dead before the next meeting.

He is said to
have had a heart attack in his flat in the Barbican centre in
London.  

The ambulance
took over 30 minutes to reach him and he was only declared dead quite a time
after reaching hospital. I spoke to a friend who was at the hospital and he
told me it was the only time he'd seen journalists cry. They felt it was a
great tragedy for the nation.

This possible
assassination opened the way for blue eyed boy Blair who had been prepared for
years to take over from Smith by party insiders and apparatchiks.

Brian Gould –
Smith's right hand man and economic genius suddenly then left
Britain to take up a University Chancellorship in
New
Zealand

Before you
dismiss this as another conspiracy theory, consider that this is actively being
investigated by a senior MP, who is convinced that the death of all three were no
accident or natural event.

This
statement from Hilary Benn should now lead to reviews of the plethora of anti-terrorist
laws that have been imposed on the majority of law abiding citizens, and have
their rights restored.

Our
advise to Hilary Benn is:
Watch your back.

Let
us hope that somewhere in this government that is bent on subjugating its own
people, that some common sense will prevail.

 

 

NuLab
– Destroying
Britain
from the inside out.

 

Advertisements

About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.