The NIR and Data Sharing – duplicity and no need for either.

National Identity Scheme

The home office
released just before Christmas their
Action Plan
for the National Identity Scheme and the NIR. 

How does this differ from, and is it included in, the
Treasury PPF of Identity Management.

In a Treasury press
dated 11 July 2006 The Chancellor of the Exchequer appointed Sir
James Crosby (the ex-Chief Executive of HBOS) to chair the Public Private Forum
on Identity Management. 

The Forum’s terms
of reference are to:

a)  Review
the current and emerging use of identity management in the private and public
sectors and identify best practice.

b) Consider how public
and private sectors can work together, harnessing the best identity technology
to maximise efficiency and effectiveness.

c) Produce a
preliminary report for the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Ministerial
Committee on identity Management by Easter 2007.

The home office
released just before Christmas their
a Strategic
Action Plan
for the National Identity Scheme, and it states in section 90 that
Sir David Varney is doing the same thing as Sir James Crosby.   

How does this differ from, or is it included in, the
Treasury PPF of Identity Management.

What’s the difference. 
Are we going to have 2 ID schemes, are we paying twice for this, and if
they are part of the same programme, has the Home Office not put the Cart
before the Horse. Surely Sir James’s forum should have a primary input into
what the Home Office is building in the first place, or we will end up with
another expensive mismatch of technology that we will either have to pay for
through more tax, or increased charges at the banks.

In the Home
office strategy document procurement is due to begin 2nd Qtr 2007,
so one assumes that they have already selected what they are going to procure,
but Sir James’s PPF does not report its preliminary findings to the Treasury on
its suggestions for technology until Easter.(8th April 07).

Have they already
decided which cronies are getting the contracts, or is the Chancellor trying to
outdo the Home Secretary.



Now we come onto Data Sharing.    

As outlined in
the press release from No10 this week, data sharing will enable better delivery
of government services.

But wait.  The home office says that the ID card will do
that, section 86 of the Strategic Action Plan states that the ID card will
provide a single access point to various government services using secure
identity verification. 

So what is it
they really want.  Everyone to have an ID
card so that you don’t have to fill in 44 forms, you just present your ID card,
or everyone’s data shared across departments.

The only benefit
I can see for Joe public is if every government office, job centre, tax office,
benefits office etc becomes a one stop shop, where you can discuss any
government department business at a single point of service. 

You could do that
with an ID card, but you could also do it with a medical card, social security card, drivers licence, passport, whatever offical document you had, there would be no need whatsoever for the data to be shared,
only to enable the front desk operative access to the relevant database
depending which service you required.

What would be
better was if the services and databases that each government department has
already got were enhanced and data cleansed, so that the information they
contained were good data.  Reports out
today say that 1 in 5 records are wrong, so the old adage of rubbish in, rubbish
out needs to be addressed before we even start to think about sharing it. 

What earthly
reason would a DVLA official want with my doctors record, Service record or my
council tax payments?.

Data sharing between
departments was banned a long time ago by Parliamentarians to protect the
rights and privacy of the individual, long before modern governments had
thought up the Data Protection Act, and I for one cannot see that those reasons
have changed. 

Don’t be fooled,
data sharing is about people control, not better services.


About IanPJ

Ian Parker-Joseph, former Leader of the Libertarian Party UK, who currently heads PDPS Internet Hosting and the Personal Deed Poll Services company, has been an IT industry professional for over 20 years, providing Business Consulting, Programme and Project Management, specialising in the recovery of Projects that have failed in a process driven world. Ian’s experience is not limited to the UK, and he has successfully delivered projects in the Middle East, Africa, US, Russia, Poland, France and Germany. Working within different cultures, Ian has occupied high profile roles within multi-nationals such as Nortel and Cable & Wireless. These experiences have given Ian an excellent insight into world events, and the way that they can shape our own national future. His extensive overseas experiences have made him all too aware of how the UK interacts with its near neighbours, its place in the Commonwealth, and how our nation fits into the wider world. He is determined to rebuild many of the friendships and commercial relationships with other nations that have been sadly neglected over the years, and would like to see greater energy and food security in these countries, for the benefit of all. Ian is a vocal advocate of small government, individual freedom, low taxation and a minimum of regulation. Ian believes deeply and passionately in freedom and independence in all areas of life, and is now bringing his professional experiences to bear in the world of politics.
This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.